“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous viewed.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal has not challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
Note: Please fill any discipline and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave discipline blank.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're in the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally audio, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion may very well be thought of, however, we're very clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for website seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, issue to availability of vacancy topic into the approval in the competent authority.
In this blog site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions along with the gravity of its punishment.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been on the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally seem, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion can be regarded as, however, we have been apparent inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, topic to availability of vacancy subject matter into the approval in the competent authority. Read more
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, is a legislation that is based on precedents, that would be the judicial decisions from previous cases, fairly than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
While many websites offer free case legislation, not all are equally reliable. It’s essential to evaluate the credibility of your source before depending on the information.
Carrying out a case law search might be as easy as getting into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, together with:
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the sensible application of this amendment and its possible to secure financial interests and maintain the integrity of the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of those changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.
13309-B of 2010 being weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be seen in the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any valuable purpose at this stage.”
This section specifically applies to civil servants who're rendered surplus mainly because of the reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, will not be topic towards the provisions with the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the using organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, such as the possibility of being posted to another department, would not utilize to non-civil servants. Read more